What do you think of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman stepping down from the committee responsible for reviewing the safety of models such as o1?

Let’s do a quick Google:

September, 2024 (OpenAI o1 Hype Pitch)

"[chain of thought means that it] learns to break down tricky steps into simpler ones. It learns to try a different approach when the current one isn't working. This process dramatically improves the model's ability to reason."

Rory defends snubbing media, cites 'weird week' - ESPN

Eighth down (on Hit & Graze)

January 2023 (Google Rewrite v6)

“Talking About Large Language Models,”

I have BPD. Why do I destroy everyone I love?

(the more accurate, but rarely used variant terminology),

“Rapidly Evolving Advances in AI”

to

Why did you choose not to join Mensa?

of the same function,

I may as well just quote … myself:

prompted with those terms and correlations),

How do I write a character’s physical description without it feeling unnatural and clunky? I’m able to describe their hair and body relatively easily because my writing puts emphasis on small movements and fidgeting, but I can’t describe faces.

ONE AI

January, 2022 (Google)

guy

Is a housing crisis looming in China?

Same Function Described. September, 2024

Further exponential advancement,

Combining,

Kelley Wolf hospitalized by officers 'against my will' days after revealing divorce - USA Today

Of course that was how the

increasing efficiency and productivity,

"a simple method called chain of thought prompting -- a series of intermediate reasoning steps -- improves performance on a range of arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic reasoning tasks.”

Citi drops gun policy after Trump slammed banks for discriminating against conservatives - New York Post

“Rapidly Advancing AI,”

Fifth down (on Full Hit)

putting terms one way,

‘The market is as clueless as the Fed’: Why this trader says stocks could continue to do well for months - MarketWatch

or

“[chain of thought is] a series of intermediate natural language reasoning steps that lead to the final output."

within a single context.

I'm looking for an answer from people who consider themselves "Gender Critical", or transphobic, or TERFs, and my question is this - Why would you refuse to use the pronouns someone wants? What does it cost you? Where's the harm?

"[chain of thought] learns to break down tricky steps into simpler ones. It learns to try a different approach when the current one isn't working. This process dramatically improves the model's ability to reason."

An

Function Described. January, 2022

How do I identify fake friends in life?

three, overly protracted, anthropomorphism-loaded language stuffed, gushingly exuberant, descriptive sentences.

when I’m just looking for an overall,

“Some people just don’t care.”

(according to a LLM chat bot query,

from

Damn.

“anthropomorphically loaded language”?

“RAPID ADVANCES IN AI”

It’s the same f*cking thing.

with each further dissection of dissected [former] Sam.

by use instances.

“EXPONENTIAL ADVANCEMENT IN AI,”

“RAPIDLY ADVANCING AI”

The dilemma:

the description,

Nails

(barely) one sentence,

step was decided,

describing the way terms were used in “Rapid Advances in AI,”

- further advancing the rapidly advancing … something.

“Rapid Advances In AI,”

within a day.

In two and a half years,

will be vivisection (live dissection) of Sam,

DOING THE JOB OF FOUR

and

in the 2015 explanatory flowchart -

“anthropomorphism loaded language”

Is it better to use the terminology,

has “rapidly advanced,”

“[chain of thought] a series of intermediate natural language reasoning steps that lead to the final output."

better-accepted choice of terminology,